There is a real and respectable path for distal radius fractures that involves a well-molded cast, weekly imaging, and patience. We use it often — particularly for non-displaced fractures, for fractures in older lower-demand patients where modest residual deformity is acceptable, and for patients who decline surgery after a clear conversation about risk. We considered that path here. The conversation was short for two reasons.
The first was the fracture pattern. An intra-articular step-off of 2 millimeters in a young, active, dominant wrist has a well-documented association with post-traumatic arthritis if left uncorrected — and our patient had decades of joint-life ahead of him. The second was occupational. His job demanded heavy lifting, repetitive gripping, impact loading from nail guns and hammers, and ladder work that required a wrist he could trust. A wrist that healed with a residual dorsal tilt and a step-off would likely have worked, in the short term — but it would have given him a worse twenty-year outcome than a well-reduced surgical fixation. We laid out both paths, including the risk of surgery (infection, hardware irritation, tendon irritation, stiffness), and he chose ORIF.